Sharing & Learning From Each Other: A Very Successful First Meeting of LIBER’s DH & DCH Working Group
LIBER and LERU Oppose TDM Position in EPC’s Copyright Vision 2014
LIBER and LERU are calling for a copyright exception for Text and Data Mining. Image by Mikael Altemark / Flickr (CC-BY)
Note: Since the original publication of this letter, six Open Access publishers have joined our call. See the updated letter.
LIBER and LERU (the League of European Research Universities) have released a letter which publicly states our opposition to the European Publishers Council’s EPC Copyright Vision Paper 2014: Copyright Enabled on the Network.
The letter underlines our shared position on Text and Data Mining and the need for a new Exception in European copyright legislation to accommodate this.
This is backed by the position taken by the EC’s Expert Group on Text and Data Mining that European copyright frameworks should be modernised to include an Exception for Text and Data Mining.
Download the letter to learn more, or read it below.
Addressed to the recipients in the EU Commission listed at the end of the letter
21 June 2014
Dear Sir
EPC Copyright Vision Paper 2014: Copyright enabled on the network
LIBER, the Association of European Research Libraries, is responding to the attached EPC Copyright Vision Paper with this Open Letter addressed to colleagues in the European Commission listed at the end of this document. LIBER is the principal grouping of academic and research libraries in Europe, with over 400 members.
LERU, the League of European Research Universities, also wishes to be associated with the statement. Since its foundation in 2002, the League of European Research Universities (LERU) has emerged as a prominent advocate for the promotion of basic research at European universities. LERU strongly believes that basic research plays an essential role in the innovation process and significantly contributes to the progress of society.
LIBER and LERU reject the statements in the EPC Copyright Vision Paper covering Text and Data Mining. The EPC document says:
“The focus of demands for an exception hitherto has been on the potential for research through automated text and data mining technologies of the world’s corpus of academic and scientific journals. In our view this is “a snare and a delusion” perpetrated by those intent on gaining free access to the widest possible body of copyright works in the name of research, going way beyond scientific journals, to works of all published authors, as well as Europe’s news media and entertainment.” (p. 48)
Neither LIBER nor LERU recognise their request for an Exception in European copyright frameworks to accommodate Text and Data Mining as ‘a snare and a delusion’. Both organisations are fully committed to seeking such an Exception in the forthcoming EU copyright review to promote the ability of European researchers to compete at a global level. This position is fully in line with the EC Expert Group’s recommendations on Text and Data Mining. We also attach LIBER’s Factsheet on Text and Data Mining, which more fully outlines our position.
Legal Uncertainty
There has been an extensive amount written about the effect that legal uncertainty is having on the practice of TDM by researchers in Europe. It has now been well established that Europe is falling behind in research outputs based on TDM because our copyright framework is not fit for the digital age. There is now a clear case for a legislative solution that allows TDM.
Market failure
The solutions offered by publishers are not only insufficient to meet the needs of researchers, they are placing European researchers at a disadvantage. One to one licences negotiated directly with publishers, or click-through licences such as those offered by Elsevier or through Crossref, are not scalable or interoperable and can have negative downstream effects on the dissemination of results and the availability of TDM tools. Moreover, these limited solutions do not address the legal barrier for researchers who wish to mine the open Web, an activity which is prevented by the lack of legal clarity in the current copyright system.
Click-through licences
Automated licencing solutions/click-through licences expose our researchers to excessive legal liability and, because they can differ between providers and be modified at any time, reinforce the situation of legal uncertainty.
Cross border issues
According to bibliometric data, over 40 per cent of research outputs from France and Germany are from international research collaborations. The UK between 1990 and 2005 saw collaborations with researchers in India, Australia, Canada and Germany grow from 50 percent with Germany and up to 65 percent in the case of India. Such collaboration is likely to grow with the establishment of international initiatives such as the Research Data Alliance and this creates a strong case for the harmonisation of copyright laws which facilitate research activities such as TDM across Europe and globally.
Contract override
Contracts for access to electronic goods should not be permitted to override the national principles and policies expressed in Limitations and Exceptions. Contract override provisions are essential to provide legal certainty to both content providers and end-users. The current situation in which libraries and researchers are compelled to sign licences for access to content which reference laws from other jurisdictions, or explicitly override Exceptions, is untenable.
Non-commercial
Since TDM is concerned only with the extraction of non-copyrightable objects (facts and data), it makes no sense when drafting a law to address the technical shortcomings of the current copyright framework to limit that solution to non-commercial uses. What is more, an exception for TDM should not distinguish between commercial and non-commercial purposes, as the definition of ‘non-commercial’ is impossible to clarify. Many research institutions receive funding from both commercial and non-commercial sources and are mandated to engage in knowledge transfer. Limiting an Exception to non-commercial work is also likely to have a chilling effect on the development and availability of tools for researchers who wish to use TDM.
Infringement
We are seeking an Exception for TDM that will allow those who have legal access to the content to extract facts and data from the content using automated methods such as crawling and scraping. We are not seeking to gain free access to copyrighted works. Mass downloading of content for redistribution to third parties with no legal right to access the content is illegal. Enabling users to perform text and data mining at scale does not equate to enabling users to steal content and make it available illegally. However, distribution of the results of text and data mining must be permissible so long as the results are not a substitution for the original work.
Technical Protection Measures
It is in nobody’s interest to deploy robots for text and data mining irresponsibly. Many websites provide information on the required crawl delays which indicate how many seconds should be left between the downloading of new pages. If publishers were to provide this information to researchers, the researchers could modify their crawls accordingly. As technology and infrastructure improves, the crawl delays should shorten. Libraries are willing to facilitate and communicate the development of best practice in the use of robots for text and data mining.
LIBER and LERU re-iterate their opposition to the EPC Copyright Vision Paper’s statement on Text and Data Mining. We wish to see copyright reform in the EU and the development of an Exception for Text and Data Mining.
We would be happy to meet with you to discuss these issues further.
Yours sincerely,
Dr Paul Ayris
President of LIBER (Association of European Research Libraries)
Chair of the LERU (League of European Research Universities) Community of Chief Information Officers
Circulation
DG CNECT
Director-General: Mr MADELIN Robert robert.madelin@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: BRINGER Olivier olivier.bringer@ec.europa.eu
Heads of Unit: Unit C3 COTTA José jose.cotta@ec.europa.eu and Unit G1 BOIX ALONSO Lorena lorena.boix-alonso@ec.europa.eu
DG JRC
Director-General: Mr SUCHA Vladimír vladimir.sucha@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: GAMMEL Jean-Philippe jean-philippe.gammel@ec.europa.eu
DG EAC
Director-General: Mr TRUSZCZYNSKI Jan jan.truszczynski@ec.europa.eu
Deputy Director General: PRATTS MONNE Xavier xavier.prats-monne@ec.europa.eu
Head of Unit 01, CROWLEY Denis denis.crowley@ec.europa.eu
Head of Unit E1, ZAMPIERI Walter walter.zampieri@ec.europa.eu
Director: Directorate C, CURELL GOTOR Jordi (Mr) jordi.curell@ec.europa.eu
Head of Unit: Unit C3, LUCHETTI Alessandra alessandra.luchetti@ec.europa.eu
DG ENTR
Director-General: Mr CALLEJA CRESPO Daniel daniel.calleja-crespo@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: FUSCO Claudia claudia.fusco@ec.europa.eu
Deputy Head of Unit: Unit A4, GARCES TOLON Eliana eliana.garces-tolon@ec.europa.eu
DG MOVE
Director-General: Mr AGUIAR MACHADO Joao joao.aguiar-machado@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: BOSCHEN Andreas Andreas.Boschen@ec.europa.eu
DG MARE
Director-General: Ms EVANS Lowri lowri.evans@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: KORDECKA Aleksandra aleksandra.kordecka@ec.europa.eu
Adviser: ASTUDILLO GONZALEZ Armando armando.astudillo@ec.europa.eu
Head of Unit: Unit C1, KING Matthew matthew.king@ec.europa.eu
DG CLIMA
Director-General: Mr DELBEKE Jos jos.delbeke@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: ZAPFEL Peter peter.zapfel@ec.europa.eu
Deputy Head of Unit: Unit C1, WOELLERT Torsten torsten.woellert@ec.europa.eu
DG ENER
Director-General: Mr RISTORI Dominique dominique.ristori@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: BOURNOVILLE Anne-Charlotte anne-charlotte.bournoville@ec.europa.eu
Head of Unit: Unit C2 , STRACHINESCU Andreea magdalena-andreea.strachinescu-olteanu@ec.europa.eu
DG ENVI
Director-General: Mr FALKENBERG Karl karl.falkenberg@ec.europa.eu
Acting Director: Directorate F, BANFIELD Nicholas nicholas.banfield@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: GENAND Lore lore.genand@ec.europa.eu
DG SANCO
Director-General: Ms TESTORI COGGI Paola paola.testori@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: GAUTRAIS Bruno bruno.gautrais@ec.europa.eu and VALLETTA Marco marco.valletta@ec.europa.eu
Head of Unit: Unit B6, TORNBLOM Carina carina.toernblom@ec.europa.eu
SECRETARY GENERAL
Director-General: Ms DAY Catherine catherine.day@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: THOLONIAT Luc luc.tholoniat@ec.europa.eu
DG RTD
Director-General: Mr SMITS Robert-Jan robert-jan.smits@ec.europa.eu
Assistant to the Director-General: PENNY Martin martin.penny@ec.europa.eu
Director: Directorate B, DROELL Peter peter.droell@ec.europa.eu
DG MARKT
Director-General: Mr FAULL Jonathan jonathan.faull@ec.europa.eu
Deputy Director-General: DELSAUX Pierre pierre.delsaux@ec.europa.eu
Heads of Unit: Unit D1, MARTIN-PRAT Maria maria.martin-prat@ec.europa.eu
Strongly support LIBER and LERU’s position on TDM.